Sad to see the Daily Telegraph devoting a whole page to an interview with Gavin Menzies, not least because it seems unkind to encourage the old boy’s delusions of grandeur. Note the headline: “Mad as a snake - or a visionary?”
This is how counterknowledge is presented after it has metastasised from its original incarnation as ground-breaking theory. After scholars revealed that 1421 was made up, no journalist could ignore the controversy surrounding his work. So we move to stage two – scholars mock him, but could he possibly be right? And, anyway, look at his sales:
But while boiling oil was being poured on him from the ramparts of academe, Menzies’s book was surging up the bestseller list. It has sold a million copies worldwide, and run to 24 editions in 135 countries.
So that’s all right, then. Note the language, incidentally: “while boiling oil was being poured on him from the ramparts of academe.” Much more dramatic than the truth: “while scholars were systematically demolishing his thesis with hard data.”
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Click here to sign up for free RSS updates.
Download the free
Join 



4 responses
This guy seems to be one step up from Erich von Daniken re: respect for evidence. You really do need a bog-ignorant audience to flog this stuff. I can only conclude that the teaching of history in schools effectively stopped at least a generation ago.
Well, Damian, since you write for the paper, don’t you think you should have a quiet word with the editor?
Ronni, I’ve already made my feelings known. I can’t really say more than that.
Incoming links from other sites