“Imagine a medicine that has a staggering 75 per cent success rate in treating cancer, and yet is a natural and ethical product, owned by a nonprofit company headed by devout Catholics.”
Well, yes, it does take a bit of imagining, not least because the first line of this report from Rome’s Zenit News is so vague. But the author, the devoutly Catholic Rome-based English journalist Edward Pentin, seems to possess the requisite imagination.
Yet this little-known product, which works by rebuilding the body’s own adult stem cells and destroying tumour cells, already has a 25-year track record as a highly effective cancer treatment. Called CellAdam, it is most effective in preventing the early stages of cancer. But it also impedes the malignant process, and has an analgesic effect in the hopeless stage of an advanced tumour. Because of its natural composition, it has none of the hallucinogenic effects you get with morphine. The ingredients simply include a fatty acid complex extracted from soy and sunflower.
“This is a totally unusual and huge breakthrough,” says Dr. Thomas Janossy, president of Biostemworld, the company producing the drug internationally. “In the next two to three years, it will become the first anti-cancer prescription drug in the world that is nature-based.”
Nature-based. As opposed to all those drugs that have been brought to us by forces outside nature.
So why has hardly anyone heard of it? According to Biostemworld, the reason is because it was developed in Hungary during the country’s Communist era. CellAdam was discovered, by chance, by Adam Kovacs, a Christian Hungarian researcher, who put his whole life into finding a cure for cancer.
Imre Beke, Biostemworld’s chairman, calls it a “diamond in disguise” because of the numerous obstacles that have prevented this drug from reaching a wider market. The first hindrance has been the Hungarian language. “As the researchers of this drug only speak Hungarian, it’s not been widely published in international media and so nobody really knows about it,” says Beke.
Aha. So the world’s cancer specialists were saying to each other: “We’ve heard that a miracle breakthrough has happened, but the research is in a language called Hungarian, so we’re stuffed, lads. The cancer patients will just have to keep on dying until someone cracks this ‘Hungarian’ language.” Pentin continues:
Then there was the country’s Communist past and personal rivalries that remained even after the fall of the Berlin Wall.
“Envy, old skirmishes and conflicts, pharmaceutical companies worried about losing their market share in the cancer business – which is huge – all played a part,” Beke explains. Moreover, Kovacs was a medical assistant and not part of the Hungarian medical establishment. The country’s medical professionals, perhaps envious of his discovery, always blocked the drug from wider distribution.
Shocking! But, you know, this isn’t the first time “envious medical professionals” have blocked natural therapies. Back to Mr P:
I caught up with Beke, Janossy and their public relations officer, Maria Dalgarno, while they were visiting Rome earlier this month. They were staying, it should be noted, not at the Hilton, but at the modest Generalate of the Sons of the Immaculate Conception. Their purpose was to meet members of a Catholic hospital run by a religious order whose charism is to help the sick.
You know, I’m already wondering whether Biostemworld needs to pay a PR person…
The company wants the order, which has 400 cancer researchers in Italy, to carry out human and animal research on the medicine. They wouldn’t name the order as negotiations are still continuing …
WTF?
… but the hope is it will carry out more quantitative analysis to make the alternative therapy more viable. It can then also be formally classed as a drug, have more credibility and be distributed more widely.
The Catholic factor in this is significant. Rather than make large profits from CellAdam, the company wants to plough all revenues made from the drug back into research, or to help Church missions. “We had a lot of opportunities to sit down with many medical research centers,” says Janossy. “But the inventor, who is a Christian, was looking for people who spoke Hungarian, were Christian-Catholic, and who had scientific and business backgrounds. Somehow we got together.” Janossy says the company steered clear of the United States because of its heavily profit-oriented pharmaceutical industry…
That would be the US pharmaceutical industry that comes under the inconveniently rigorous scrutiny of the FDA, I’m guessing.
… and instead looked toward this Italian Catholic hospital. “Their whole approach to healing is so different,” Janossy says. “The president is a priest who’s not picking up a salary. All the profit goes back to research or is sent to the missions. That is extremely unique. So we said, ‘OK we will share this product and the potential it has.’”
Once any cancer drug hits the market, it can generate revenues of hundreds of millions of dollars. Biostemworld is expecting CellAdam will generate over a billion dollars once it becomes fully viable in about two to three years. “It’s huge,” says Janossy, “but we want the profit to be shared or managed by a Catholic interest where the hope is that the profit will help the people in need. It’s a very unusual approach.”
So what evidence is there that this drug really works? Apparently, there is no shortage of testimonies …
There never is.
… in addition to the company’s claim that it has a 75% success rate. There is a bus driver in Hamilton, Canada, who has just found out that after taking CellAdam for less than a month, a 5-centimeter tumour has been reduced to the size of pea and now he doesn’t have to worry about having chemotherapy.
There is the case of a woman with lung cancer – the hardest kind to treat – which had become so bad that she had gone home to die. “She started to take CellAdam and within two months she was practically clear,” says Janossy.
“Constantly, every couple of days, there are these dramatic cases.” Janossy says an ongoing 10-year study in Hungary is currently focusing on two groups of cancer sufferers. One group, who all went through chemotherapy, have since died, but those who have been taking CellAdam are still alive.
Size of groups? Details of mortality? Pentin doesn’t tell us. Perhaps he didn’t ask.
CellAdam works by breaking down a shield that is preventing cancer cells from communicating with the body’s natural immune system, allowing it to kill the cancer cells. “It is putting back your immune system into balance,” explains Beke, “assisting your immune system to cure the cancer, enhancing your own system to be natural and letting a natural process take over a sick body.” Certain cells react better than others to the drug, such as breast, lung and large intestinal cancer cells, melanoma malignum and certain types of obstetric tumours. But even large tumours can be blocked by CellAdam, claims Biostemworld.
It’s [sic] best track record, however, is as a cancer prevention therapy. When used as a dietary supplement, it works by building up the body’s adult stem cell count. Stem cells can decrease by as much as 80% in the course of a lifetime, leading to signs of ageing, a weakened immune system, and diseases such as cancer. With CellAdam and its other nature-based drugs, Biostemworld claims it can restore that count by as much as 75%, exceeding a similar product in California by 50%. Not only do they prevent cancer, but other diseases too.
Furthermore, Biostemworld argues its products are without the dangers associated with synthetic drugs because they are less toxic. Janossy says pharmaceutical companies prefer synthetic drugs because they are easier to patent and so make more money. But he adds that synthetic drugs tend to mimic what is already available in natural drugs, some of which have been used in countries such as China for over 4,000 years.
And you believe this shit, Pentin? Have you never read a word of Ben Goldacre? Do you have any idea how utterly meaningless it is to say that “synthetic drugs tend to mimic what is already available in natural drugs”?
But perhaps the most persuasive proof of this drug’s effectiveness is the belief among those running Biostemworld that this discovery is Providential. Global cancer deaths are expected to rise by 45% by 2030, overtaking cardio-vascular disease as the biggest cause of death, and putting great strain on health services and society. “We feel in a lot of ways that Our Lady has really inspired us,” says Maria Dalgarno who is also a member of the Catholic movement Focolare. “[Governments] know the system can’t manage it – they’ve said it. There’s no way they can take care of all those people.”
She pointed to the growth of euthanasia, which is gaining popularity in the West as demand for health care for the elderly increases. “My first thought when this company was forming was: bingo, this had to come because the medical establishment is saying: ‘What are we going to do with all these old people?’”
Dalgarno felt it was “truly God’s work,” not only because it could help counter the push toward euthanasia, but also because their products are less expensive, less dangerous and more ethical. Embryonic stem cell research plays no part in this medicine.
“We put our work daily under the protection of Our Lady,” says Dalgarno, “knowing she is guiding our work and the ‘mission in the health field’ that we feel called to.”
Like the Good News, this does seem too good to be true, but perhaps that just shows that this drug really does have the Divine hand behind it.
Or it may show that Edward Pentin has been taken for a ride by a group of (possibly well-intentioned) Catholic snake-oil salesmen. Even if CellAdam works, we have been offered no convincing evidence that it does. But Catholic cancer sufferers who have read this article will no doubt be queuing to take the stuff, convinced that its efficacy is guaranteed by God and his Mother.
And if they do, and if the claims made for CellAdam turn out to be bollocks, and if they die early as a result, then you, Edward Pentin, will need to examine your conscience.
If you enjoyed this post, why not subscribe to our RSS feed or follow us on Twitter? You might also consider making a donation to the Counterknowledge.com fighting fund.
Click here to sign up for free RSS updates.
Download the free 
Join 
30 responses
Yes, and if it works?
Oh Jakob…
How will you know if it works unless it is subjected to properly managed, blinded, randomised, controlled clinical trials?
Until then, this is a “snake oil” pitch. A very obvious one too.
Why are you putting down this possible God given cure, when you have not even given it a chance. The people who prevent a cure to cancer are the ones who are making billions of dollars pumping chemo into the veins of poor unsuspecting victims, who die anyway or maybe even because of…..I watched them pour Chemo into my husband shaking their heads and smiling it was looking very positive, until almost a year later they couldn’t believe that a tumor had formed under his stomach while all the time they were smiling and treating him with Chemotherapy. He died, by the time they recognized what had happened he had become terminal. God forbid this is happening to many others.
No “snake oil” here??? Watch how you evaluate this treatment!
Loretta
Snake Oil (N)
(medicine) any of various liquids sold as medicine (as by a travelling medicine show) but medically worthless
(taken from wordnet.princeton.edu)
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it probably *is* a duck.
I’m not going to comment on the product, because without proper scientific testing with appropriate methodology there is no point in commenting on it, either for or against. Maybe it does work, but only testing with confirm or disprove that.
I am rather disappointed that Zenit chose to run this story as written. I read Zenit daily, and its coverage of Catholic news is usually good. I put this lapse down to their relative inexperience in dealing with stories with scientific content. I wrote to the editors today:
“While the involvement of apparently well-meaning Catholics in the development of this purported cancer treatment makes this story of obvious interest to Zenit, I am dismayed by the complete lack of any scientifically verifiable support for the claims reported and, frankly, endorsed by the article. Other than some individual anecdotal evidence and vague references to studies — the methodology and size of which are not revealed, not are any citations provided — there is nothing to indicate that this treatment is reliably effective or even that it is safe.
“I understand that Zenit does not specialise in scientific stories, but I believe it is your editorial responsibility to ensure that, when stories do deal with scientific topics, appropriate critical rigour is applied.”
It’s very common to read stories like Loretta’s (above) where people express anger at medicine in general because it didn’t work for them, and then say that alternative medicine must therefore be better.
Of course a treatment shown to be effective overall won’t work for everyone who takes it, and with the best currently available evidence there may be simply no way to predict who will do well and who won’t, in fact that may never be possible, but we might still know that overall, people will do better than if they don’t have the treatment, and so it is a risk-benefit decision. These are often difficult, and we need to be strong about coping with the results when they are bad.
What I find interesting is this. These stories have always instantly seemed to me to be angry emotional rejections, the kind of thing you might accept in yourself transiently, but very clearly not helpful information in deciding whether either chemotherapy or snake oil works. Why is this not the case for everyone? Why do some people read a story like the one from Loretta above and genuinely view it as vindication of quackery, a rational argument for it? Is there are an intellectual step in the reasoning that I’m simply missing?
The only time I’ve tried to discuss this with somebody, the conversation wound around to them saying “being rational and intellectual aren’t the only ways to see the world”, which almost felt like a clear acknowledgement that this was a kind of tantrum. I hesitated for a moment before using that word, but the phrase “The people who prevent a cure to cancer are the ones who are making billions of dollars pumping chemo into the veins of poor unsuspecting victims” was so childish, and felt so much like textbook quack marketing, that I do have a concern over whether the story was genuinely more than that.
I can understand the scepticism.
If the claims turned out to be true, I dont think we would see it on prescription in its ‘Biostem’ form. So I hope the active ingredients could be manipulated sufficiently to enable it to turn a profit for a major pharmaceutical firm.
(Thats not a pop at pharmaceuticals by the way…that we need them is a fact).
That could be a long way off though, if alpha lactalbumin is anything to compare it to. Its disapointing to see that after over 10 years of study by Lund University yielding positive results, breast milk as a treatment for cancer is still in the realm of quackery.
Its a tough one I know….how can it be manufactured? Could we rely on milk banks? would it be depriving infants etc etc. Its fraught with controversy.
Anyway I’m going off topic here, sorry.
Milo: On that note you might want to check here,
http://counterknowledge.com/2008/12/google-trends-and-the-demise-of-homeopathy/#comment-10573
for some off topic offensive links.
Thanks, Steve. They must have got past our spam filter.
This stuff is already being sold over the Internet, so Zenit just gave free publicity to a commercial product, not a laboratory venture.
What is wrong when BioStemworld used MLM to market Celladam and make billions if it is successful or they go bust if
they fail. This is alternative medicine and base on the ingredients listed - looks better than vitamin B17(nitrilosides) which I am a believer. The muti-billons $ Big Pharm block and
condemn B17 because they can’t patent something from nature and profit from it. I am from the East and what is wrong with you people in the West - just give this Company a chance to prove
this natural medicine works. And one more, one of the natural ingredients is Klamath Blue Green Algae(Aphanizomenon fos-aquae, AFA) derives from Lake Klamath, Oregon USA. It has been marketed for 20 years. Go to: http://www.klamathbluegreen.com
Hey asshole, yes you who wrote the article . Give it a chance. Let’ s see whether it works or not. When the proper tests are done then we can criticize it or not. Why don’t you do research to see if there are actual pending discussions regarding tests?
How are patients going to die early if they try it? No one is telling them to abstain from normal treatment. YOU’RE AN IDIOT who tries to make himself appear intelligent through a hyper-critical outlook. You’re concern is about your own ego not the protection of others
Counterknowledge.com seems to specialise in “abuse” - look at how certain writers, medica/pseudo-medics etc., are repeatedly called names etc. The justification is, usually, that they have been shown to be frauds/idiots etc. But whoever the banned poster was surely he/she was merely calling the CK post author a fraud based on a rather balanced review of his book on the subject - fortunately I saw it before you censored it. And the review dies seem to show that. As the review deals with Big Pharma and “cures” etc. it was entirely relevant and ON TOPIC. I hope you can post this. Failure to do so will, I fear, rather confirm the opinion that you aren’t interested in open debate. I sincerely hope that I’m wrong about you chaps.
There seem to be alot of contradictory comments and claims by the people at Biostemworld and Adam Kovacs
There is also a claim on the Project New Hope website that ” We will be happy to provide you all necessary information about the revolutionary Celladam system. In the past 25 years more the 500,000 people took this simple blood test, which gives an early warning of any abnormal condition. The test indicates the potential of problems with the body’s tissue balance much earlier than any other known testing in the world. ”
Doesn’t anyone have the results published? What happened to all those people?
It would seem that already there has passed time enough to see if this product works……if anyone has kept records and is willing to publish those records…..
Then one reads on http://www.belianiaga.com/celladam.html that “8./ References: Human therapical experiences has been practiced in tens of thousands of persons since 1984. A representative controlled group of experiments of 650 persons has been successfully tried and all has survived the cancer status between 1988-1998.” and ” patented in Canada CA 1 255 231 filed 06.06.1989.
yet one also reads:
” “As the researchers of this drug only speak Hungarian, it’s not been widely published in international media and so nobody really knows about it,” says Beke. ”
Someone in Canada knew about it 20 years ago…..
Did anyone happen to notice the ponzi scheme on the Biostemworld website?
I keep having difficulty reconciling:
“”Here is how you can become a Millionaire in 9 months by promoting the most promising all-natural products in the world.”
“”Our Corporate mission is to empower our Associates to become free people and control their own destinies. If you are willing to apply your God given talent and extra effort to help your friends and neighbors, then we will grant you the financial vehicle to retire within a year. Such a financial freedom will provide you one of the most precious gifts in life: free time that you may spend as you wish. ”
versus
“Rather than make large profits from CellAdam, the company wants to plough all revenues made from the drug back into research, or to help Church missions. ” “”We put our work daily under the protection of Our Lady,” says Dalgarno, “knowing she is guiding our work and the ‘mission in the health field’ that we feel called to.” {from Zenit}
And did “the Vatican” really endorse this product, as in:
“Breaking News! The Vatican endorses this Cancer Treatment”
http://www.covermelegal.ca/Stem%20Cell%20Research.htm
ponzi?
millionaires?
The Virgin Mary guiding the mission of financial success?
Or, for a treatment trip to Hungary, only $1800.US, plus airfare, lunches, doctor’s fees, treatment fees
In case you want to crunch some numbers about expanding operations in countries such as China, this has been done for you ! :
http://www.belianiaga.com/celladam.html
http://www.bellianiaga.com
which also claims that all the patents for Celladam had run out….
“6./ Legal status of the Patent:
Patent of HU 200093B in Hungary filed 20.12.1983, patented in Canada CA 1 255 231 filed 06.06.1989.
ALL THE FILED PATENTS HAS BEEN EXPIRED ALREADY !!”
Finally, how many scientists name their discoveries after themself?
Hello John Loh and John Woo:
1.what is the link to the ingredients for Celladam?
2. JW wrote: “Let’ s see whether it works or not. When the proper tests are done then we can criticize it or not. Why don’t you do research to see if there are actual pending discussions regarding tests?
How are patients going to die early if they try it? No one is telling them to abstain from normal treatment. ”
****the drug has been around for over 25 years, long enough for
2 patents to expire.
What kind of doctor would advocate using a drug (and yes, the Biostemworld people in Canada, Britain, Hungary, and the USA are advocating the use of this drug) that had not had the proper testing done?
What kind of company urges lay people to become millionaires in 9 months by selling an untested product?
And while simulataneously saying that all profits are going back into research and church missions?
Patients can die early if they use something that is toxic to them. Do you have suggestions for how a patient travels to Hungary for Celladam treatment while simulataneously not abstaining from normal treatment?
Thanks
If “Celladam” is truly a miracle cure and its makers want to be altruistic and keep it out of the hands a “greedy American drug company,” why not release the formula to all drug companies and put it in the public domain. The result would be a miracle drug as cheap as aspirin that would be easily obtainable for rich and poor alike all over the world. It all looks a bit suspicious to me; but it would be great if I’m wrong.
Is it coincidence that Focolare is an anagram of Foolcare?
Mind you, any product that has been peer-reviewed by the Virgin Mary must, automatically, have a higher approving authority than mere scientists….
While I agree with this article the offensive and snobby way it is written does nothing to help the case it is trying to put forward.
Seems to happen with a lot of articles on here.
john woo
If this company were truly interested in curing cancer, they would be rushing into clinical trials. You don’t “give medicine a chance” by letting companies like this make untested claims and make money off of vulnerable people. You “give medicine a chance” by running controlled clinical trials.
If this wonder drug is truly that powerful, guess what? They stop clinical trials early and give everyone the treatment.
I am astonished that those who claim to be believers prove to be the greatest skeptics. It seems to me that one cannot be certain of the efficacy of this product without trying it. However, the same applied 2000 years ago to a new sect known as Christians.
By the same token, shouldn’t this debate be balanced? If those presenting this substance are asked to prove themselves, shouldn’t skeptics be likewise obligated to prove their point of view? Why should one side be burdened while the other is free to make its own unsubstantiated statements? It seems Christian justice is missing from this debate.
Didn’t Christ say that those who have not seen and yet believe are blessed?
God gives us two ways to treat disease. The first is through the extra-natural acts known as miracles. The second is through scientific means. Scientific does NOT mean medical and pharmaceutical. There are many ways in which we can scientifically treat ourselves which fall outside of the ossified, arrogant framework set forth as Scripture by medical professionals who fancy themselves to be God.
I don’t know if this stuff works as advertised. I do know that there seems to be no reason to assume it doesn’t.
It is obvious from the title of Mr. Thompson’s book and website that he simply assumes that such products are scams. He is, therefore, hardly unbiased and his opinions are at least as suspect as the claims made by those who happen to believe in the power of non-pharmaceutical therapies.
It’s a shame that believers in God’s Truth find it so difficult to look outside of man’s Pharisaic paradigms for solutions to our earthly difficulties.
I wonder if this substance’s ingredients include mustard seeds? It seems the critics are missing even that much true faith.
“If those presenting this substance are asked to prove themselves, shouldn’t skeptics be likewise obligated to prove their point of view?”
Simple answer: NOPE. The burden of proof is always on the party making the extraordinary claim, and there is no question at all that the extraordinary claims here are those of CellAdam.
“I don’t know if this stuff works as advertised. I do know that there seems to be no reason to assume it doesn’t.”
There only “seems to be no reason” if one is intensely gullible. My God, it’s amazing how the same people who will readily believe that Thuh Dredded Big Pharma is suppressing a cure for cancer, for the sake of money, can’t comprehend how anyone might possibly be falsely claiming to have a cure for cancer, for the sake of money.
“The burden of proof is always on the party making the extraordinary claim…”
Incorrect. The burden of proof is always on the ACCUSER, not the defender. In free, civilized nations, we convict based on evidence. Those accused are not required to prove innocence. Those accusing are required to prove guilt.
The previous system of justice, the one which was based on proving innocence, resulted in the Salem Witch Trials, indubitably one of the low points of our history.
You refer to “people who will readily believe that Thuh Dredded Big Pharma is suppressing a cure for cancer…” That is, of course, an oversimplification. Obviously the pharmaceutical industry is not suppressing any given therapy. They are, however, fostering an atmosphere in which people believe that the only possible treatment for any given disorder is one which was developed using billions of dollars and going through years and years of bureaucratic red tape to pander to the Government (which, let’s face it, screws up far more often than not, so how can we trust the Government to be a judge of what works and what doesn’t?)
The pharmaceutical industry has created this air of disbelief for one reason: to ensure that new competitors cannot emerge. this is not about suppressing a specific therapy. It’s about avoiding competition across the board.
“”“The burden of proof is always on the party making the extraordinary claim…”
Incorrect. The burden of proof is always on the ACCUSER, not the defender.”
If that’s how you understand the issue, then it only shows you don’t understand the issue. Scientific issues do not usually even have an “accuser” and a “defender”; it’s only when scientific issues get tangled up with other issues such as law enforcement that such roles come into play.
If we were talking about, say, who could be convicted of fraud in connection with their promotion of a quack cancer cure — to name a hypothetical example — then the government would have the obligation to show the defendants’ guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (at least in the US system.) That’s an attribute of the US legal system, but science doesn’t work that way and neither does common sense. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If you don’t comprehend this, then I will make one thousand different absurd, bizarre, contradictory extraordinary claims and then point out that in your logic you are obligated to believe ALL of them until you DISPROVE them.
Lack of a common language never hampered other scientific
advances. Why should it this time?
I grew up in Hungary both my grandmother (colon cancer–1989) and my father (sarcoma-1993) had cancer, both of them took CELLADAM and unfortunately neither benefited.
The real problem with Mr Kovacs that he never provided any scientific evidence either preclinical or clinical for over 25 years The reasons, about the drug being developed by an “underdog ” Hungarian and that is why not to test, publish and make it available, are of course ridicoulus. Also, Mr Kovacs made enough money during this 25 years so he could afford to buy the most popular soccer team in Hungary…
Now I am a practicing oncologist and untill proven otherwise I will advise my patients against taking CELLADAM.
This is likely a valid product. But I will say, it is also very likely a ‘ponzi’ scheme. The hand is out all over the place for new money, and I am willing to bet the poor sap investors have not seen anything unless they have complained. How long have these guys been operating?
The cancer product CellAdam may just be for real, but sometimes the ‘good’ in the hands of the ‘not so good’ is enough to taint things.
What may have to happen is the cure may have to be put in the hands of some caring people.
The ‘books’ of this company must be examined. The investment money must be looked at to see if it has been ‘registered as a security’.
Apparently, the co. is working on a shestring budget with volunteers. Wouldn’t it be a good thing is the cancer cure could be broken down in a lab somewhere? Hmmmm…… if you want to help, please email me: ponzibuster@gmail.com
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_schemes
We have some real information that suggests potential concerns about this company! We need your help if you have had any experience with them. This is not a joke!
Please help us at:
http://www.twitter.com/ponzibuster or
ponzibuster@gmail.com
Visit My Website
Long story short, my mom was diagnosed with Stage 4 lobular metastasized cancer. With
over 100 lymph nodes around her neck, breasts as hard as rock, and no shot at chemo or
surgery because doctors said they “wouldn’t know where to start”– we were left with
little hope and less options. I recalled reading your article and I thought, “heck, might
as well give it a shot”. Doctors gave my mom a life sentence of a few weeks to 3 months
because she was a “ticking time bomb”. That was two and a half years ago! No chemo, no
surgery, just Cell Adam AND– she started praying to the Virgin Mary upon taking these
products. The tumors in her breast are about 2/3 of the size they were two years ago and
within 2 weeks of commencing her use of Cell Adam, her 100 visible lymph nodes dropped to
less that 10 around her neck.
Not to mention, this journey has brought many others who use the products across my path.
From a woman who uses it just as an analgesic in Toronto (due to very advanced stomach
cancer) to a man who was healed of a seven inch tumor in his stomach in San Antonio– the
votes are unanimous: Cell Adam works!
So, lovely individuals at Counterknowledge, the purpose of this email is two fold.
1) To inform you that Cell Adam, in an indubitable way, works to fight (and even heal)
cancers, while it is not cancer specific as far as my inquiries have led me to believe.
2) Further research has led me to believe that those who pray while using the products
(and generally) have increased health benefits. I guess what I’m trying to say is, prayer
works too.
Blessings,
FB
Incoming links from other sites